On Melmac, saying "have a nice day" is punishable by death.

Health

Vaccine Propaganda Exposed & Analysed

Published by NHF UK admin on October 16th, 2011

by Danielle Bryant BSYA (N.Th.)


To Immunise or Not To Immunise – THAT is the Question! It certainly is a question that only YOU can answer whether it immunising your baby or having the flu vaccine.I am hoping that this analysis of and insight into the propaganda surrounding the vaccine and immunisation drives by local health authorities will help you to see how your logical thoughts are manipulated to make you afraid NOT TO vaccinate. This is done mainly by fallacies which are tricks that can stop you thinking logically, and can therefore alter your decisions and even beliefs!

 

Vaccine season is certainly now upon us. We have seen many distasteful “advert” banners outside doctor’s surgeries stating “ROLL UP ROLL UP FOR YOUR FLU JAB” – like it’s some sort of circus! What a clever way to try to make the vaccine seem that it is not a serious issue – no big deal! But then maybe this should also tell us that we shouldn’t be taking the advertising and scare mongering seriously!
Sadly, though it really IS a serious issue, especially to those who have been harmed by the vaccine, or the family members of those who have died soon after having the vaccine.
The chant “Roll Up Roll Up” also puts me in mind of a snake oil salesman – is this REALLY what our doctors are becoming? If I were a doctor I would be insulted by this approach to advertising one of my services and I think it is appalling that the government feel they can treat our health so trivially and non-seriously! They think it’s a circus? And what are we? The monkeys? Yes – that would be test monkeys held in our cages of fear.
Flu Roll Up Roll Up Banner

The vaccination campaigns are almost all based upon a fallacy that appeals to our emotions and the emotion they use is fear. When we are afraid, especially for our health and the health of our children, we will do anything to help ourselves, but in truth this is just making us more vulnerable to misinformation.
They also encourage us to make an assumption. The assumption that if something is believed to do something good then it isn’t bad (or at least can’t be THAT bad).

You can see by the NHS poster opposite how much they use fear to promote the jabs. Fear is induced not only by the exaggerated and inaccurate imagery, but also stating that we do not know all the facts about flu, making us think there is a lot more to it and scaring us into the jab. But what they don’t do is state the fact that we do not know all the facts about the jab EITHER!It also states the the flu virus is clever as it “continually evolves and mutates”. This makes us think of something alien or disgusting, further adding to fear. But if you read between the lines, what this ALSO states is that the vaccines cannot possibly help! The vaccine you have in your arm was developed (at least) months previously – so this means that the virus the vaccine protects against has now surely mutated and evolved into a different strain!

They also state “if you suffer from certain chronic illness or are 65 or over you are especially at risk” – yet this is also true of the jab (but they hide this information from you).

This advert is clearly trying to belittle the HPV vaccine, trying to demonstrate that it is a matter-of-fact everyday thing. Also in this way putting the message across that it is not serious.But the truth is that it IS serious and the decision to have a vaccine that contains an ingredient that made EVERY rat tested on STERILE should not be taken lightly at all!

List of fallacies that I have found in this very short advert (after only a short while, I could maybe write a lot more if I had a lot more time!)
Fallacy 1: Appeal to Common Practice – if everyone does it then it is OK for me to do. This is shown by all the pupils going about their day and having the vaccine.
Fallacy 2: Appeal to Popularity – most people approve of this so it must be OK.
Fallacy 3: Bandwagon – everyone else does it so I will too or otherwise I may not be accepted. This is shown by linking arms with her friend, both getting the vaccine together.
Fallacy 4: Questionable cause – HPV and cervical cancer sometimes occur together so HPV must cause cervical cancer (this has been proved NOT to be the case by the FDA without the presence of an infection). In the words of the FDA: “Based on new scientific information published in the past 15 years, it is now generally agreed that identifying and typing HPV infection does not bear a direct relationship to stratification of the risk for cervical cancer. Most acute infections caused by HPV are self-limiting [1, 4-7]. …Repeated sequential transient HPV infections, even when caused by ‘high-risk’ HPVs, are characteristically not associated with high risk of developing squamous intraepithelial lesions, a precursor of cervical cancer.”
“A woman found to be positive for the same strain (genotype) of HPV on repeated testing is highly likely suffering from a persistent HPV infection and is considered to be at high risk of developing precancerous intraepithelial lesions in the cervix . It is the persistent infection, not the virus, that determines the cancer risk.(ref:redpillreich.blogspot.com)
Fallacy 5: Appeal to Authority – the NHS are passing on information given to them by pharmaceutical salesmen, but making us think they are the experts in this, and so we trust them.
Fallacy 6 (double): Appeal to Emotion (fear) & Slippery Slope – HPV MAY occur and if it does Cervical Cancer WILL be inevitable (this is how it makes us think – not the truth!!) and this invokes our fear to be scared into having the vaccine.
And finally…calling the vaccine the “Cervical Cancer Vaccine” is extremely misleading as it does NOT protect from cancer at all. There are still many strains of HPV not covered by the vaccine and as we have just read from the FDA’s own words, it is the infection NOT the virus that can lead to cancer. But calling it this lures people into a false sense of security and gives them false information just from the name.

What makes things worse about obtaining information about vaccines is that we trust what our GPs tell us, and they generally tell us there is nothing to worry about and the vaccines ‘save lives’, but the fact is they are given increasingly large bonuses for the number of patients they vaccinate. As many surgeries/doctors come to rely on these bonuses their advice inevitably may become more profit-related than health-related.

While we are preparing further UK specific article and campaign about vaccines, please visit the extensive vaccine information section on thenhf.com website:-
http://www.thenhf.com/page.php?id=129

see also the NHF website at http://thenhf.co.uk/

Here is an excellent article entitled “Seasonal Flu Vaccines, Are They Safe or Necessary?”

Another article by the Sovereign Independent entitled “Conclusive link now admitted: Swine Flu Vaccine causes Chronic Nervous System Disorders”

Advertisements

The dangers of airport body scanners

The Dangers of Airport Scanners

Published by NHF UK admin on October 16th, 2011

By Danielle Bryant BSYA (N.Th)

I recently received an email from a friend of mine regarding the controversial full body airport scanners. They are now in place at Manchester, Gatwick and Heathrow airports and on test at Dublin.These pose a huge violation to our privacy in the name of ‘terrorism’ – but this is just one part of the controversy. Scientific facts are emerging regarding how they can actually be extremely detrimental to our health.

Below is a copy of a memo and email sent from a group of professors in the University of California to the President for Science and Technology.

April 6, 2010

Dr. John P. Holdren
Assistant to the President for Science and Technology

Dear Dr. Holdren:

We, a number of University of California, San Francisco faculty, are writing — see the attached memo — to call your attention to our concerns about the potential serious health
risks of the recently adopted whole body back scatter X-ray airport security scanners. This is an urgent situation as these X-ray scanners are rapidly being implemented as a primary screening step for all air travel passengers.
By way of introduction one of us (John Sedat) met you recently when he and his wife Dr. Elizabeth Blackburn, a 2009 Nobel Laureate, talked with President Obama last December. Dr. Sedat is Professor Emeritus in Biochemistry and Biophysics at the University of California, San Francisco, with expertise in imaging.
He is also a member of the National Academy of Sciences. The other co-signer includes Dr. Marc Shuman, an internationally well known and respected cancer expert and UCSF professor, as well as Drs. David Agard and Robert Stroud, who are UCSF Professors, X-ray crystallographers, imaging experts and NAS members.

Sincerely yours,

John Sedat, Ph.D

David Agard, Ph.D

Marc Shuman, M.D.

Robert Stroud, Ph.D.


LETTER OF CONCERN

We are writing to call your attention to serious concerns about the potential health risks of the recently adopted whole body backscatter X-ray airport security scanners. This is an urgent situation as these X-ray scanners are rapidly being implemented as a primary screening step for all air travel passengers.

Our overriding concern is the extent to which the safety of this scanning device has been adequately demonstrated. This can only be determined by a meeting of an impartial panel of experts that would include medical physicists and radiation biologists at which all of the available relevant data is reviewed.

An important consideration is that a large fraction of the population will be subject to the new X-ray scanners and be at potential risk, as discussed below. This raises a number of ‘red flags’. Can we have an urgent second independent evaluation?

The Red Flags

The physics of these X-rays is very telling: the X-rays are Compton-Scattering off outer molecule bonding electrons and thus inelastic (likely breaking bonds).

Unlike other scanners, these new devices operate at relatively low beam energies (28keV). The majority of their energy is delivered to the skin and the underlying tissue. Thus, while the dose would be safe if it were distributed throughout the volume of the entire body, the dose to the skin may be dangerously high.

The X-ray dose from these devices has often been compared in the media to the cosmic ray exposure inherent to airplane travel or that of a chest X-ray. However, this comparison is very misleading: both the air travel cosmic ray exposure and chest X-rays have much higher X-ray energies and the health consequences are appropriately understood in terms of the whole body volume dose. In contrast, these new airport scanners are largely depositing their
energy into the skin and immediately adjacent tissue, and since this is such a small fraction of body weight/vol. possibly by one to two orders of magnitude, the real dose to the skin is now high.

In addition, it appears that real independent safety data do not exist. A search, ultimately finding top FDA radiation physics staff, suggests that the relevant radiation quantity, the Flux [photons per unit area and time (because this is a scanning device)]has not been characterized. Instead an indirect test (Air Kerma) was made that emphasized the whole body exposure value, and thus it appears that the danger is low when compared to cosmic rays during airplane travel and a chest X-ray dose.

In summary, if the key data (flux-integrated photons per unit values) were available, it would be straightforward to accurately model the dose being deposited in the skin and adjacent tissues using available computer codes, which would resolve the potential concerns over radiation damage.

Our colleagues at UCSF, dermatologists and cancer experts, raise specific important concerns:

A) The large population of older travelers, >65 years of age, is particularly at risk from the mutagenic effects of the X-rays based on the known biology of melanocyte aging.

B) A fraction of the female population is especially sensitive to mutagenesis-provoking radiation leading to breast cancer. Notably, because these women, who have defects in DNA repair mechanisms, are particularly prone to cancer X-ray mammograms are not performed on them. The dose to breast tissue beneath the skin represents a similar risk.

C) Blood (white blood cells) perfusing the skin is also at risk.

D) The population of immuno-compromised individual — HIV and cancer patients (see above) is likely to be at risk for cancer induction by the high skin dose.

E) The risk of radiation emission to children and adolescents does not appear to have been fully evaluated.

F) The policy towards pregnant women needs to be defined once the theoretical risks to the fetus are determined.

G) Because of the proximity of the testicles to the skin, this tissue is at risk for sperm mutagenesis.

H) Have the effects of the radiation on the cornea and thymus been determined?

Moreover, there are a number of ‘red flags’ related to the hardware itself. Because this device can scan a human in a few seconds, the X-ray beam is very intense. Any glitch in power at any point in the hardware (or more importantly in software) that stops the device could cause an intense radiation dose to a single spot on the skin. Who will oversee problems with overall dose after repair or software problems? The TSA is already complaining
about resolution limitations; who will keep the manufacturers and/or TSA from just raising the dose, an easy way to improve signal-to-noise and get higher resolution? Lastly, given the recent incident (on December 25th), how do we know whether the manufacturer or TSA, seeking higher resolution, will scan the groin area more slowly leading to a much higher
total dose?

After review of the available data we have already obtained, we suggest that additional critical information be obtained, with the goal to minimize the potential health risks of total body scanning. One can study the relevant X-ray dose effects with modern molecular tools. Once a small team of appropriate experts is assembled, an experimental plan can be designed and implemented with the objective of obtaining information relevant to our
concerns expressed above, with attention paid to completing the information gathering and formulating recommendations in a timely fashion. We would like to put our current concerns into perspective. As longstanding UCSF scientists and physicians, we have witnessed critical
errors in decisions that have seriously affected the health of thousands of people in the United States. These unfortunate errors were made because of the failure to recognize potential adverse outcomes of decisions made at the federal level. Crises create a sense of urgency that frequently leads to hasty decisions where unintended consequences are
not recognized. Examples include the failure of the CDC to recognize the risk of blood transfusions in the early stages of the AIDS epidemic, approval of drugs and devices by the FDA without sufficient review, and improper standards set by the EPA, to name a few.

Similarly, there has not been sufficient review of the intermediate and long-term effects of radiation exposure associated with airport scanners. There is good reason to believe that these scanners will increase the risk of cancer to children and other vulnerable populations. We are unanimous in believing that the potential health consequences need to be rigorously studied before these scanners are adopted. Modifications that reduce radiation exposure need to be explored as soon as possible.

In summary we urge you to empower an impartial panel of experts to re-evaluate the potential health issues we have raised before there are irrevocable long-term consequences to the health of our country. These negative effects may on balance far outweigh the potential benefit of increased detection of terrorists.


Flu shot questions….

Some people close to me tend to get quite spooked by my wariness of flu shots, in fact, all shots….so I include little snippets like these…and as always, please get in touch on the comments bar if you think any of the information is inaccurate, as it is only intended to inform and protect….

The Flu Vaccine – a discussion of facts on the label. – Coalition For Informed Choice

I ACTUALLY WALKED INTO A DOCTOR’S OFFICE

Coalition For Informed Choice

Tedd Koren, DC

The other day I walked into a doctor’s office that was advertising flu
shots and asked for a product insert for the 2011-2012 flu vaccine
(Flulaval from GlaxoSmithKline.)

She handed me a CDC one page sheet urging all people to get the flu
shot.  I said, “Thanks, but can I get the actual paper that comes with
the vaccines.”  She gave me an odd look (“Why would anyone want to
read that?”) but went into the back and got me one.

Before I left I said to the MD, “Did you know that there is mercury in
the shots?”  “No, I didn’t know that,” she said.  (Why should she know
that, she only gives the shots.)

“You know if you vaccinate a pregnant woman the mercury can go through
the placenta into the fetus,” I said to her.

She said nothing.  I might have been speaking Klingon. Then again if
we were Klingons the interaction may have involved high explosives and
lots of bad language.  (Please forgive me, the other day I watched a
Star Trek movie).

OK, back to the flu.  After I left her office I began to engage in an
unnatural act, I actually read the product insert. The print was very
small but I slogged through it.  These are quotes directly from the
product insert.  Read them and be amazed (doesn’t anyone actually read
these?)

Does the flu shot protect someone from getting the flu?

“There have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a
decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with FluLaval®.”

It’s given to nursing mothers

“It is not known whether FluLaval® is excreted in human milk … safety
and effectiveness of FluLaval® in pediatric patients have not been
established.”

What’s in the shot?

“The virus is inactivated with ultraviolet light … followed by
formaldehyde … disrupted with sodium deoxycholate … 45 mcg.
Hemagglutinin (HA) … each dose contains 25 mcg mercury … the vial
stopper does not contain latex.” (Nice to know for those who are
concerned about latex reactions).

Can it cause cancer or affect the reproductive system (what about the baby?)

“FluLaval® has not been evaluated for carginogenic or mutagenic
potential, or for impairment of fertility.”

Adverse events associated with influenza vaccines:  Anaphylaxis … “the
1976 swine flu influenza vaccine was associated with an increased risk
of Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS). Evidence of a causal relation of GBS
with subsequent [influenza] vaccines is unclear.”

How long were the test subjects observed after vaccination to see if
the flu shot caused long-term damage?

“Individuals were observed for three days after the flu shot was
administered in see if there were adverse reactions.

Postmarketing surveillance From the insert:

“Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of
uncertain size it is not always possible to reliably estimate their
incidence rate or to establish a causal relationship to the vaccine.”

“Lymphodenopasthy, eye pain, photophobia, dysphagia, vomiting …
influenza-like symptoms … rhinitis, cellulitis, muscle weakness,
arthritis, tremor, syncope, Guillain-Barre syndrome, convulsions,
seizures, cranial or facial nerve paralysis (Bell’s palsy),
encephalopathy, limb paralysis …”

Cost

Fluarix® (single dose) for ages 3 years and older. Multidose has Hg,
single dose does not. Fluarix: $101.20 for ten single vial doses
(approximately $10/shot cost to MD).

No mercury in single vials.

FluLaval ® – Multidose: $70.80 for one vial of ten doses ($7.08 cost
of one shot).  (Nice markup.  I bet CVS, Walgreens and the other big
purchasers get even better prices).

Gary Krasner, Director
Coalition For Informed Choice
188-34 87th Drive, Suite 4B
Holliswood, NY 11423
718-479-2939
(note:  there may be silence after you dial.  But remain on the line.
I can hear it ringing)
www.cfic.us
cfic@nyct.net

DO NOT use my other email address:
garykrasner@gmx.com
UNLESS your message is over 3 MB is size.

“For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over
public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled” . . . Richard P. Feynman

DISCLAIMER:
I’m neither a lawyer nor medical physician.  It should not be
construed from any materials I distribute that I’m dispensing legal or
medical advice.


Dr Suzanne Humphries – a few things she knows.

The comments, if you click on her original link make interesting reading.

 

Suzanne Humphries, MD

I am a Medical Doctor with credentials in internal medicine and nephrology (kidneys). I received a bachelor’s degree in theoretical physics in 1987 from Rutgers University. I mention the college degree in case any doubtful readers question my mental prowess. One can doubt my intellectual ability less if they first realize that I know how to figure out difficult things. I know how to look at something in depth for many hours or days until I understand the inner workings of it. This is what I learned to do in college. In fact the strenuous mind-bending exercise that was part of the physics curriculum made medical school easy. I found the study of the human body, chemistry and biology to be in comparison quite shallow, simple and easy to comprehend.

I also spent two years working in a biochemistry lab as the head technician. There I learned many things that at the time I didn’t think would ever serve any purpose in my life. But in fact, as our destinies are often predetermined, the lab experience did indeed come around to serve me. In the recent days of vaccine debates, need for scientific proof, evidence of harm, I have found that knowledge of the technical aspects of animal studies and cell cultures are very good things to understand.

I have spent four years teaching internal medicine and nephrology to medical students, residents and advanced fellows in training at a university hospital as an assistant professor. During that time, reading over and critiquing dozens of journal articles was a part of everyday life. Suffice it to say, my past experiences have put me in good standing to look into the problems with vaccines and make certain determinations. Like most doctors, I held a blind belief for many years, that vaccines were necessary, safe and effective. Like most doctors, I never lifted a page to seek out any other truth for myself. But unlike most doctors, I have no stake in upholding false paradigms and I am no longer indebted to the government for hundreds of thousands of dollars. Unlike most doctors, I have the means to survive with or without my medical license because I have sought out another education to support myself in case of worst case scenario. I do not feel fearful to speak the plain truth as it sits on the pages in front of me. Thousands of pages and hundreds of hours have led me to see the horrifying truth of what is being done to people and animals all over the world under the false pretense of “health”.

I am of sound mind, on no pharmaceutical drugs, carry no medical diagnosis and am unusually fit for my 47 years. I am happy, and have no grudge against any particular party. Up until 2 years ago I was content to work as a medical doctor caring for very sick people with kidney failure. Two years ago, everything changed. With several undeniable cases of kidney-associated vaccine injury in previously healthy people, I started to look deeper into the information that I had previously held as factual and not worthy of debate. I started to study vaccines, their components, and the science behind the statements of safety and effectiveness. From there an avalanche of truth collapsed upon me and I will never be the same. In fact, nothing I look at will ever be the same. Chronic degenerative diseases, kidney failure, autoimmune diseases and powers of authority will never look the same to me again. There are certain things that I can now say with no uncertainty.

Vaccines did not save humanity and never will.

Vaccines have never been proven truly safe except for perhaps the parameters of immediate death or some specific adverse events within up to 4 weeks.

Smallpox was not eradicated by vaccines as many doctors readily say it was. They say this out of conditioning rather than out of understanding the history or science.

Polio virus was not responsible for the paralysis in the first part of the 20th century. Polio vaccine research, development, testing and distribution has committed atrocities upon primates and humanity. Bill Gates is not a humanitarian.

Vaccines are dangerous and should never be injected into anyone for any reason. They are not the answer to infectious diseases. There are many more sustainable and benevolent solutions than vaccines.

Medical authorities should not have the final word on how doctors treat individual patients in the privacy of their own offices and should not be able to dictate injections into our private hospital patients.

The list goes on, but with this introduction I challenge health care practitioners to look into the topic of vaccines with an open mind, on their own. I implore them to read books and alternative literature sources. I ask that they understand that the peer review process has censored intelligent doubt on vaccine safety and driven it into the alternative press. I beg that all health care practitioners place their egos beside them and be ready for what will happen when the truth is visible. You may not want to go back to work. You may not be able to follow the recommendations that are being ever more heavy handedly given to you. I ask this for the good of humanity. With each passing moment more and more money and power is being handed to the powers that be and the end result is a barrage of vaccines starting at the first hours of every life that is born in a conventional manner. The injections pile up and the new illnesses appear shortly thereafter more and more every year. The degree of illness in such an advanced society should not be accepted as normal or just environmental. Please, parents and health care practitioners do your homework. The minds and bodies of future generations depend upon it.


A great film – Dying to have known – by Steve Kroschel

This is a must see.  I’d be interested in any comments.  Was riveting viewing, see for yourself…


What you ought to know about Irish water.

Fluoride Poisoning – It’s All Over

By Mary Sparrowdancer

4-9-11

German and Austrian scientists knew in the
early 1930s that an overactive thyroid (hyperthyroidism)
could be successfully treated by bathing patients in water
containing minute amounts of fluoride. They had discovered
nearly a century ago that fluoride blocked thyroid function.
For the US government, long partnered with the
pharmaceutical industry, to then force this same treatment
on a nation of people with healthy thyroids under the lie
that fluoride “prevents cavities in children,” is
unconscionable. The Nuremberg Code of ethics pertaining to
human experimentation labels it an act of crime, stating,
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely
essential.”  Today, 70% of the US is being forced to receive
this thyroid-blocking chemical via their water without
consent or medical monitoring for overdose, allergic
reaction or blocked thyroid function. The benefits are being
reaped by the largest of US industries:  The pharmaceutical
industry. Fluoride has created a nation of sufferi ng people
seeking more drugs to treat blocked thyroids and fluoride
toxicity. We might drink bottled water, but most of us
cannot avoid the bathwater.

Deliberately damaging the thyroid will produce
a plethora of symptoms affecting the entire human body from
head to toe. Symptoms of thyroid damage and fluoride
poisoning include weight gain, edema, kidney disease, kidney
failure, hair loss, depression, aggression, aches, pains,
skin problems, bone deformities (likely including
“arthritis” and spontaneous fractures), sexual/erectile
dysfunction, memory loss, weakness, fatigue, heart disease,
irritability, cancer, digestive disorders including severe
GERD as a result of swallowing fluoride, nausea, vomiting,
visual problems, gum disease, “high cholesterol,” connective
tissue damage, brittle teeth, wrinkles, premature aging,
dehydration, and long, long after the whole body has been
damaged, “cosmetic fluorosis” might finally show up in a
tooth or two. “Cosmetic fluorosis” is usually the only sign
of fluoride poisoning mentioned by fluoride promoters, while
downplaying the rest of the signs as though their
livelihoods depended upon it.

Lethal fluoride doses cause death to occur by
“natural causes” such as cardiac arrest, or acute renal
failure or (for those who believe that cancer is a “natural
cause” of death), by cancer. Fluoride binds to and possibly
mimics calcium, but fluoride is a liar. The heart cells
utilize a perfect balance of calcium and magnesium and other
natural substances in the body’s matrix to cause the heart
to beat and then rest. Fluoride, bound to the calcium,
confuses the normal functioning and cellular communication
within the body, and causes arrhythmias.

The fluoride that is purchased by municipal
waterworks and added into public drinking water is not even
a “pharmaceutical grade” fluoride. It is primarily discarded
waste, a slurry of toxins not wanted by the phosphate
fertilizer mining corporations that sell it to waterworks.
From there, it is then disposed of (sometimes by unskilled
workers) into our drinking water. For those who have
swallowed the propaganda that fluoride is “completely safe,”
and is some kind of a “nutrient” that is good for us, there
is news footage available of a recent fluoride spill that
took place in Illinois. A Hazmat team in protective gear was
called in to clean up the mess, but not before the fluoride
began eating through the concrete driveway it had spilled
upon.

This should leave little question as to why a
2005 study by the American Gastroenterological Association
showed that there was a sharp increase in Barrett’s
esophagus and GERD, and other reports show that
adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, once rare, has now become
one of the most frequently occurring cancers. Fluoride can
eat its way through a titanium container. Fluoride is
converted in the stomach into hydrofluoric acid, an acid so
strong that it cannot be stored in a glass container because
it will eat the glass. Fluoride, proven to block thyroid
function, is not a substance we should be forced to drink,
breathe, eat, and bathe in without our consent.

Fluoride promoters have utilized all seven
propaganda techniques identified by the “Institute for
Propaganda Analysis,” (est. 1937 and brought to an early end
in the 1940s), including “Name-Calling, Glittering
Generality, Transfer, Testimonial, Plain Folks, Card
Stacking, and Band Wagon” in order to keep the fluoride
flowing here and creating medical problems. Mention an
aversion to fluoride, and the promoters will more than
likely make comments about “tinfoil hats,” or make a
reference to the strange movie, “Dr. Strangelove.” They also
refer to people opposed to being dosed with fluoride against
their wills as “anties” as though attempting to paint a
picture of opponents as confused old ladies. The one thing
that fluoride promoters are incapable of doing, however, is
engaging in a logical debate about fluoride. They cannot
debate fluoride because they have no real facts or clinical
evidence showing that fluoride “prevents cavities.” They
merely repeat, as they have been repeating for over 60
years, the following mantra: “It is well-known that fluoride
prevents cavities.”

If fluoride “prevented cavities” as the CDC
and other government pharmaceutical branches imply, they
would be shining a light on the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
According to the NIH “Community Water Fluoridation Status by
State” 2002 report (reportedly updated in March of 2010),
the state of Kentucky ranks #1 in having the highest
percentage of fluoridated water of all states in the US.
According to Kentucky Oral/Dental Health, the state has
received awards for achieving this feat. “The American
Dental Association, the Centers for Disease Control and the
Association of State and Territorial Dental Directors have
recognized Kentucky’s efforts.” If we were going to see
water fluoridation in action and working as promised by the
fluoride salesmen, we would have seen its miracles clearly
happening on any given day in the gleaming smiles of our
Kentucky neighbors. Instead we see something unexpected.

When the ADA’s and CDC’s exaggerated hoopla
dies down, a check of the facts reveals that Kentucky is
also ranked #1 in other areas not mentioned during the
praising ceremonies. Kentucky ranks #1 in incidence of
cancer in the USA, and it ranks at the top for having one of
the worst dental health scores in the US. Despite all of its
award-winning fluoridation, it has one of the worst rates of
cavities in children, as well as complete toothlessness in
adults. One must also wonder if the spontaneous fractures
and tendon problems in the racehorses might be due to the
fluoride in their drinking water. Horses drink many times
more water than humans do.

Even more disturbing than the lie about the
“benefits” of having “optimally fluoridated water,” is that
the majority of physicians do not know how to treat fluoride
poisoning, nor do they even know how to look for it or
diagnose it. Due to the media, many people simply conclude
that Americans are just fat and lethargic, everyone has
heartburn so what else is new, arthritis is just bone aches
and crippling deformities, fibromyalgia is a sign of
malingering, and degenerative disk disease raises no
eyebrows or questions as spines spontaneously collapse and
disks bulge from sea to shining, oil-slicked sea. We are not
adequately studying cause and effect at this time. Instead
of treating symptoms with even more pharmaceuticals, we need
to start looking for the cause of the symptoms.

Many physicians are unaware that in addition
to the daily doses of fluoride their patients are receiving
via water, air, dental products, and our
fluoride-contaminated food, a growing number of prescription
drugs are now fluorinated as well. Lipitor, for instance, is
fluorinated and has been known to cause aches and pains, and
according to the Lipitor website, can cause serious muscle
problems resulting in kidney failure, as well as liver
problems, edema, tendon problems, jaundice, nausea and GI
problems. A number of patients are reporting memory loss, as
well; however, this complaint has not yet become an
“accepted” side effect. All of these complaints are, however
, “accepted” symptoms of fluoride poisoning. High
concentrations of fluoride can also be found in other
unexpected items, such as tea, grapes and raisins, and some
American wines contain too much fluoride to be sold in
European markets.

The amount of fluoride constituting a “lethal
dose” is not even known at this time due to disinformation
and lack of appropriate study, nor is it known how long a
lethal dose will take to finally kill the victim via organ
failure or cancer. Most of the deliberate fluoride dosing is
sub-lethal, thus allowing people to live out their lives
without frank evidence that they are being chronically
poisoned by a daily dose of fluoride. They will, however,
live out their lives while suffering from the resulting,
unexplained but now “commonly found” symptoms that their
grandparents never had. They will desire lifelong
medications for relief of these symptoms, and no one knows
how many years the fluoride will shave off the life of each
person being forced to take it.

In following a recent case of massive fluoride
poisoning in a previously healthy, 42-year-old male living
in New York City, the true extent of the national fluoride
and crime cover-up surfaced. The victim, an inventor named
Sean Dix, stated that his dentist poisoned him with a
sublingual dose of liquid chemicals. By the following
morning, he was in acute renal failure, as subsequently
documented by lab tests. His head-to-toe symptoms matched
many of those already mentioned, except he did not have
nausea, vomiting or other GI distress, for the simple reason
that the chemicals had been administered under his tongue.
He had not swallowed it, so it bypassed the liver and
intestines that would have otherwise filtered some of the
poison out. He had saved his scant morning-after urine
sample, and after I learned of his symptoms I urged him to
have it tested for fluoride. I suggested this because of the
data I had obtained years earlier through the government’s
FOIA regarding fluoride effects and symp toms.

The first indication of a massive fluoride
cover-up occurred when Sean Dix then tried to have his urine
tested, only to discover that there are no hospitals or labs
in NYC that routinely test for fluoride levels.  He tried
elsewhere, including in other states, and could not find any
hospitals that routinely tested for fluoride, as though the
level of fluoride in one’s body is now a great, state-kept
secret.

The victim was told to take a train to
Connecticut, drop his urine off at a lab there, and they
would then forward his specimen to another lab that would
test it for fluoride. The fact that there are no hospitals
or labs found that do simple, accurate, routine urine
fluoride tests means that no one really knows what the
fluoride levels are in Americans. We do, however, know that
the US ranks #1 worldwide in its consumption of
pharmaceuticals used to treat the massive symptoms now
plaguing Americans. Too sick to travel to Connecticut, it
was necessary for the NYC victim to hire two separate US
forensic labs, as well as ship his urine to India in order
to have it tested for fluoride.

He then discovered that there are at least two
types of equipment used to test for fluoride, resulting in
at least two completely different test results. A cheaper,
less sophisticated test, Ion Selective Electrode, or ISE,
(sometimes referred to as Ion Specific Electrode) can
apparently give a false low reading. Another test, by Ion
Chromatography (IC), is expensive but stated to be far more
accurate.

It is currently guessed that any level of
fluoride over perhaps 1 or 2 ppm showing up in the urine
might indicate poisoning. In Hooper Bay, Alaska, a water
fluoridation disaster reportedly caused by an unskilled
fluoride handler, resulted in a community being poisoned by
fluoride. This resulted in the death of one man. Testing of
the deceased man’s urine indicated he had a reported level
of “55 mg per liter” of fluoride, according to an article in
the New England Journal of Medicine. It has been reported
that the unfortunate 41-year-old man had symptoms of nausea
and vomiting, and in an innocent attempt to remain hydrated,
he drank more and more of the fluoride-poisoned water until
he had a heart attack and died. He was found dead in his
home. On the surface, this suggests that 55 mg/L must be the
upper limits of fluoride poisoning before death claims the
victim. Fluoride, however, deserves much more than a mere
surface study.

According to ISE forensic testing, the
morning-after urine of the still-living NYC poisoning victim
contained only slightly over 1 mg/L of fluoride. This was
momentarily reassuring, and I apologized to Mr. Dix for
having been so certain he had been poisoned with fluoride.
Several hours later, the forensic lab using the more
sophisticated IC testing revealed their results. Repeated IC
testing showed that his urine contained over 160 mg/L of
fluoride, with the lowest adjusted level being 132 mg/L.
Three weeks after being poisoned, his urinary fluoride level
spiked to an incredible 188 mg/L, by IC.

The next unfortunate discovery was that no one
had ever heard of fluoride levels this high in a living
person, no one knew what to do about it, no one knew how to
treat it or remove it, and no one knew if the man was going
to live or die. In addition, no one knew what caused the
three-week spike, or if the dentist had poured an “extended
release” fluoride product under his tongue, meaning she was
dosing him repeatedly. She was refusing to cooperate with
those asking questions.

The next bizarre discovery was found after
contacting a group of toxicologists who stated that they
would not even look at lab tests to determine a diagnosis of
fluoride poisoning. They determined fluoride poisoning only
according to their list of “nationally accepted” symptoms.
Unless the victim’s symptoms matched their “accepted” list
of symptoms, they would not consider him to have been
poisoned with fluoride.  As stated, the NYC victim did not
have nausea and vomiting, nor did he have the excessive
salivation as noted on the “accepted” list, and therefore he
did not qualify for the “poisoned by fluoride” diagnosis. He
had a dry mouth and dehydration. He also had additional
symptoms that were not on the “accepted” list, symptoms that
were possibly previously unknown and were being documented
for the first time. These included sudden loss of
near-vision acuity and eye pupils constricting to
“pinpoints.”

The next discovery of a massive cover-up of
fluoride and crime occurred when the victim reported his
poisoning to the police. The NY police refused to
investigate or even question the dentist. After finally
obtaining a toxicology narrative based upon forensic
evidence stating he had been poisoned by fluoride, the
victim again attempted to file criminal charges against the
dentist but he was blocked at every step of the way. He took
the matter to the District Attorney, the NY State Troopers,
and to the Governor, but at this time, nearly one year later
, no one has been willing to charge or even question the
dentist who appears to have pulled off the worst and most
surreal case of fluoride poisoning ever reported.

The next discovery that was stumbled upon
regarding the massive fluoride and crime cover-up was that
the US government does not have a national database
documenting incidence and prevalence of American thyroid
disease. While the US government follows prevalence and
incidence of diabetes, cancers, cardiac problems, bone
problems and every other disease imaginable, it does not
nationally follow thyroid disease. This is despite the fact
that the government is forcing 70% of the US population to
take daily doses of thyroid-blocking fluoride in their
water.

At this time, one year later, the NYC victim
continues to struggle with kidney problems along with joint
and bone pain, and his well-cared for teeth are now pitted
and showing signs of “cosmetic fluorosis” near the area
where the dentist poured liquid fluoride under his tongue.
This is despite the fact that some “experts” claim that the
development of cosmetic fluorosis in an adult is not
possible. The Park Avenue dentist remains free to go about
her daily routine without any consequences after having
poisoned Sean Dix.

Because ISE testing is less expensive and
therefore more commonly used than IC, it is possible that
much of our information regarding fluoride levels is based
upon false low readings. It is possible that the fluoride
levels in our bodies might be much higher than we have
previously assumed, possibly putting us all in great danger
for cardiac arrhythmias, kidney disease, premature aging and
cancers, in addition to all of the other symptoms of just
not feeling well. We have been led down a propaganda path
for over 60 years regarding the nonexistent “benefits” of
fluoride, while no safety measures to guard us against
fluoride poisoning or even routinely check us for fluoride
or blocked thyroids have ever been made.  The only
“benefits” of fluoride are being pocketed by the
pharmaceutical industry selling drugs to treat the resulting
national array of symptoms.

The result of this governmental cover-up means
that it is apparently easy now to get away with murder in
the United States if one has “professional” access to a
supply of liquid fluoride and if one knows how to administer
it at the right dose so that it will not cause immediate
death. The victim will walk away a ticking time bomb not
knowing that he was just poisoned; he will most likely not
know to save his urine 12 hours later and even if he does,
hospitals do not routinely and accurately test for fluoride
in the US; physicians know very little about fluoride in the
US; the most commonly used fluoride testing equipment has
flaws; the “accepted symptoms” list for fluoride poisoning
is flawed; and, a few days, weeks or months after the
poisoning (when the death might occur) the victim will be
nowhere in the vicinity of the person who poisoned him. In
addition, by that time there might be very little trace of
the fluoride left in the blood or urine, but it will have
done its damage on its way o ut of the system. It will have
left behind a wake of chaos.

One must now wonder how many innocent people
have been “removed” by fluoride poisoning with no one ever
suspecting a thing. Very few know enough about fluoride to
watch for symptoms and no one routinely tests for fluoride
overload with IC. One must at this time wonder how many
assassins have gotten away with murder because of the
disgraceful cover-up of fluoride in the US. Because of this
cover-up, fluoride has become an ideal tool for assassins.
Leading assassination expert, Professor Emeritus James
Fetzer, is now studying the case of the attempted murder by
fluoride of Sean Dix.

It is my hope that the above information will
serve to alert this entire nation of the problems and
dangers we now face with fluoride. It is my hope that law
enforcement personnel, coroners, hospitals, clinics,
municipal water personnel and healthcare professionals
throughout the United States will responsibly study all they
can about fluoride, responsibly ban it immediately from use
on humans, and then responsibly establish new policies
regarding accurate, affordable, routine testing for human
fluoride levels in hospitals and clinics.

Until that happens and we finally have some
measure of protection against fluoride poisoning, I would
suggest that we all safeguard ourselves by saving urine
specimens 12 hours after dental visits, or after any event
that leads to unexpected illness, such as dining out . . .
or perhaps even after dining in. Saving urine samples will
provide us with potential documentation, and documentation
removes some of the invisibility and motivation from any
would-be murderer or assassin who presumes he or she knows
exactly how to get away with murder in the United States.

*********

Mary is a medical, health, science and
political writer who is currently being fluorosed against
her will in Tallahassee, Florida. She is a columnist for
Jeff Rense, www.rense.com. She has a lengthy background in
the studies of laboratory science, veterinary science,
ornithology, and she provided free humane care to over
20,000 wild birds and wild animals, including endangered
species, before turning her focus on providing help for
humans.  She is an internationally published author of four
books. (All English books in the US are sold out at this
time. Books remain available in Germany and Japan.) Mary has
a daughter who is a Deputy Sheriff in Tallahassee, and she
has a son in Tallahassee who recently ran for a seat in the
Florida Senate.

*********
Links to references:
Schuld, Andreas, Parents of Fluoride Poisoned
Children –
A. “History of Fluoride” – “Around the same
time (1932) Gorlitzer von Mundy, being aware that fluorides
also get absorbed through the skin, began fluoride
treatments of hyperthyroid patients in Austria by
prescribing 20 minute baths containing 30ccm (0.03l) HF per
200 liters of water. He reported on his successful treatment
spanning over 30 years and involving over 600 patients at a
1962 symposium on fluoride toxicity in Bern, also attended
by other world-leading experts including George Waldbott.”

B. Gorlitzer von Mundy V – “Ein neuer Weg zur
Behandlung der Thyreotoxikose mit Fluorwasserstoffsäure”
Med
Klin 21:&17-719 (1932)
(reports on the first successful use of baths
containing HF in the treatment of hyperthyroidism)

C. Gautier – Bull Soc Chim 14:241 (1914);
cited in: Kraft K -”Beiträge zur Biochemie des Fluors
I.Über
den Antagonismus zwischen Fluor und Thyroxin.” Hoppe-Seglers
Z.Physiol. Chem 245:58 -65 (1937)
D. May W – “Behandlung der Hypothyreosen
einschließlich des schweren genuinen Morbus Basedow mit
Fluor” Klin Wochenschr 16:562-564 (1937)
Schuld, Andreas, PFPC –
http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/thyroid_history.html
Meiers, Peter – (Historian) –
“Guenther Schiemann, Wolfgang Winkelmueller,
Wilhelm Roselius: ‘Verfahren zur Darstellung von
Kondensationsprodukten kernfluorierter Arylaldehyde’, German
Patent DE 621,862; filed July 1, 1932; pat. Nov. 14, 1935.”
– Patent for fluoride medication used to treat
hyperthyroidism, and,
Kurt Kraft, Ferdinand Dengel: “Verfahren zur
Herstellung kernsubstituierter Phenylessigsäuren,” German
Patent DE 819,696; filed Feb. 3, 1943; pat. Nov. 5, 1951 (A
compound similar to fluorotyrosine, i.e.
3-Fluoro-4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, was patented by Kraft
and Dengel of Knoll, pharmaceutical company of Ludwigshafen,
and became known under the names of “Capacin,” “Kapacin,”
and “Wiflucin” [marketed by Knoll] as a treatment against
hyperthyroidism. – s.a. The Merck Index, 9th edition, Merck
& Co., Rahway, N.J., 1976) Meiers, Peter –
http://www.fluoride-history.de/

Nuremberg:
http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html

Barrett’s:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/12/051202084834.htm

Esophageal cancers:
http://cancerprevention.aacrjournals.org/content/1/5/308.full.pdf

Hypothyroidism:
http://www.endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/Hypothyroidism/

Thyroid:
http://www.endocrineweb.com/conditions/thyroid/
hypothyroidism-too-little-


Dr David Ayoub

This is a sober presentation with excellent support material delivered by a medical doctor outlining in detail his concerns over the effects of thimerosol / mercury in vaccines.

It is alarming to watch, but not ‘alarmist’ in the style of delivery.  The tone employed throughout the presentation is not extreme, but rather ‘matter of fact’.

In the interests of a balanced debate about the use of these marketed products, I feel it is a useful video to include here in the blog.  Please watch it, and there is the comments box below if there are any opinions to be aired.

Its all about looking after eachother.  I am not against vaccination per se, I am against subjecting our children to factors increasing their exposure to risks of suffering neurological developmental disorders.